The Truth About Our Demicratic Top Leaders-In There Own Words.America-Trust Me Obama Wasnt Counting On These Remarks,Getting Out ((We Have Been Had))

A Week In The Life Of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards

Posted in Congress, Democratic Presidential Candidates, Good Reads, Hillary Clinton, Politics by jimbyrd on October 3, 2007

The Democrats are building an alter. If you are legal, prosperous, moral, principled, employed and have exemplary health insurance, your life will never be the same if one of the Democrat presidential front runners is elected. If one of the Democrat front runners is elected and you smell something burning, guess who’s being roasted?
The Democrat party, it’s sycophants and the far left blogosphere who control the strings and the cash, have become a dirty and unsanitary aggregation. Even their money ceaselessly proves to be dirty.
If you are a black male, living in the USA, you are going to die or go to prison–John Edwards is your only liberator from this quagmire of death and incarceration.

“We start with the president of the United States saying to America, ‘we cannot build enough prisons to solve this problem. And the idea that we can keep incarcerating and keep incarcerating – pretty soon we’re not going to have a young African-American male population in America. They’re all going to be in prison or dead. One of the two.”

What does this make the Democrat campaign contributers and candidates? If the same self serving logic is applied that the Democrats have used to call Bill O’Reilly a racist and Rush Limbaugh anti-military and General Petraeus a liar, it qualifies anyone associated with the Democrat party as a racist, a murderer and an incarcerater of Black men.
Hillary Clinton raised 29 million dollars in the third quarter. Barack Obama and John Edwards raised 19 million and 7 million respectively. So the Democrat constituents who contributed to the campaigns of Clinton and Obama, instead of Edwards, are perpetuating the death and incarceration of Black males by not contributing to Edwards– thus denying him the opportunity to bring about the salvation of the Black community.
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are killing and incarcerating Black males by proxy for not conceding the nomination to Edwards immediately so St. John can get started with the salvation of doomed Black males.

Nancy Pelosi thinks the above picture, promoting the Folsom Street Fair in San Fransisco, depicting Christ and his disciples as homosexuals and perverts at the Last Supper, complete with sex toys instead of drink and food is A-OK.

Asked to respond to a San Francisco “gay”-festival’s promo mocking the Last Supper of Jesus Christ, the chief spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi offered a dismissive quip.
“As a Catholic, the speaker is confident that Christianity has not been harmed,” said Drew Hammill, the San Francisco Democrat’s press secretary.

Not only is Pelosi a major supporter of homosexual activism and advancement, she is set to receive an award Oct. 6 from the “gay rights” group Human Rights Campaign.
Pelosi’s religious dissoluteness has no boundaries:

The fair that Pelosi supports, features the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, a homosexual group describing itself as “21st century nuns for the queer” that mocks Catholicism.
The “Sisters’ planned a “Last Supper” last night in preparation for the San Francisco fair: “There is no better way to prepare your mortal flesh for the kinkiest weekend on Earth than to nourish your bones and boost your spirit with a divine feast.

Yet after throwing her abundant support behind one of the most sacrilegious and anti-Christian events imaginable, she does an about face and calls Bush and states she is, “praying for him and praying that he would change his mind and sign the bill”, which expands a federal insurance program by $35 billion over five years, far in excess of Bush’s own proposal.
What god is she praying to? After her impious attitude concerning the sacrilegious depiction of the Last Supper and support of Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence , perhaps she is praying to Baal.
There was a Democrat presidential debate in New Hampshire last week. It was moderated by Tim Russert. One of the questions he asked the front runners was whether or not they would be comfortable with the book King and King being taught to their children in a second grade curriculum. The book is a controversial book taught to second graders in Massachusetts. The book is about the same sex marriage of two princes that fall in love.
John Edwards, the savior of Black men, answered with this:

Edwards answered “yes–I want my children to understand everything about the difficulties that gay and lesbian couples are faced with every day, the discrimination that they’re faced with every single day of their lives.” Edwards said, “He doesn’t want to influence his kid’s opinions about the issue.”

Obama answered with this:

His sentiments are similar to those of Edwards, and, when asked whether he’d sat down to talk about same-sex marriage with his young daughters, he replied that his wife had.

Clinton answered it as only a Clinton could, with a non-answer and absolutely no implication of a commitment to any line of thinking:

“With respect to your individual children, that is such a matter of parental discretion,” Clinton said. “Obviously, it is better to try to … help your children understand the many differences that are in the world. … And that goes far beyond sexual orientation. So I think that this issue of gays and lesbians and their rights will remain an important one in our country.”

Not one candidate had an objection to teaching same sex marriage to second graders in public schools. These candidates are always mindful of the radical left-wing bloggers who control their party and it’s money. They did an exemplary job of appeasing their money makers on this subject.

MIAMI, Florida- A tiny baby girl born at just over five months has defied medical expectations by surviving, in a case that reinforces arguments against gestational abortion laws, the Daily Mail reported earlier today.
Amillia Taylor was born at a Miami hospital one month earlier than the date considered viable for most babies, at just 21 weeks and six days gestation. She weighed less than 10 oz and was just nine ½ inches long.

Intrauterine cranial decompression and intact dilation and extraction, or as it is commonly known, partial birth abortion, is permitted up to the 24th week. Amillia Taylor was born at 21 week. She recently celebrated her 7 month birthday. Who believes it would have been acceptable to have aborted her at 21 weeks? Who has perpetuated this procedure and would have had no inclination to stop this baby from having her body pulled out of the womb, except for the head– a pair of scissors jammed into the back of her head then a suction catheter inserted into her skull and the her brains sucked out causing her skull to collapse.
The three front runners for the Democrat party believes this is acceptable.
Hillary Clinton commenting on the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling to uphold the 2003 federal ban on partial-birth abortion:

This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman’s right to choose and recognized the importance of women’s health. Today’s decision blatantly defies the Court’s recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account.
It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.

John Edwards, the savior of Black men, commenting on the same Supreme Court ruling:

I could not disagree more strongly with today’s Supreme Court decision. The ban upheld by the Court is an ill-considered and sweeping prohibition that does not even take account for serious threats to the health of individual women. This hard right turn is a stark reminder of why Democrats cannot afford to lose the 2008 election. Too much is at stake – starting with, as the Court made all too clear today, a woman’s right to choose.

Barack Obama on the same Supreme Court ruling, except his wife has turned partial birth abortion into a fund raising opportunity:

I strongly disagree with today’s Supreme Court ruling, which dramatically departs from previous precedents safeguarding the health of pregnant women. As Justice Ginsburg emphasized in her dissenting opinion, this ruling signals an alarming willingness on the part of the conservative majority to disregard its prior rulings respecting a woman’s medical concerns and the very personal decisions between a doctor and patient.
I am extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a woman’s right to choose, and that the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to erode Roe v. Wade, which is established federal law and a matter of equal rights for women.
In February 2004, U.S. Senate candidate Barack Obama’s wife, Michelle, sent a fund-raising letter with the “alarming news” that “right-wing politicians” had passed a law stopping doctors from stabbing half-born babies in the neck with scissors, suctioning out their brains and crushing their skulls.
Michelle Obama called partial-birth abortion “a legitimate medical procedure,” and wouldn’t supporters please pay $150 to attend a luncheon for her husband, who would fight against “cynical ploys” to stop it?

And lastly, Hillary Clinton went in the shop for scheduled maintance and had the newest laughter software added. She showcased it last Sunday on the talk show circuit.
Hillary Clinton Showcasing Her New Laughter Software

Well, there you have it. These staunch and gallant defenders of morality have raised the bar for decency and if any of them are elected, I am sure they will lead the country down the path it deserves.